A Diagnostic Framework and Multi-Evaluator Audit of Evaluator-Driven Preference Dynamics in Self-Adapting LLM Agents

9d ago · Global · primary source: export.arxiv.org

A new diagnostic framework called EPC reveals that measurements from proprietary large language model evaluators can become invalid within weeks, according to a preprint study. The framework detected version-conditional instability that makes single-snapshot evaluator studies unreliable [1]. The EPC framework comprises the Multimodal Preference Collapse Index (MPCI), an evaluator-indexed coupling matrix, and Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD). Researchers applied it across eight experimental conditions, totaling 122 unique repetitions [1]. Coupling coefficients ranged from 0.00 to 1.18 across per-condition means, with a coefficient of variation of approximately 0.9 [1]. Four conditions showed strong coupling, while four collapsed to near-zero values [1]. The study's most informative measurement involved a drift in GPT-4o between May and June. An eight-run re-replication inverted the study's conclusion, demonstrating that the diagnostic instrument detected its own instability [1]. Self-evaluation consistently collapsed, with 97 percent of cases registering zero JSD and a JSD value of 0.003, though the authors note that floor effects are possible [1]. Machine learning, the broader field encompassing these models, relies on statistical algorithms that learn from data and generalize to unseen tasks without explicit programming [2]. The instability documented in the EPC study underscores a challenge inherent to such systems: performance can shift as underlying model versions change, even when the evaluation protocol remains identical [1]. An output-format confound analysis found a per-strategy aggregate correlation coefficient of 0.89, but the per-instance correlation dropped to 0.219 with a p-value of 0.093 [1]. The authors report the Preference Convergence Index as a metric for preference convergence. The finding is not any single coupling magnitude but the pattern of version-conditional instability that undermines single-snapshot evaluator studies [1]. The preprint, submitted on June 29, 2026, includes all data and the EPC framework for public release [1].

model-releasetool-releaseapplicationresearch-papercommentary

Background sources we checked (6)
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ Machine learning (ML) is a field of study in artificial intelligence concerned with the development and study of statistical algorithms that can learn from data and generalize to unseen data, and thus perform tasks without being explicitly programmed. Advances in the field of de…
  • arxiv.org ↗ # A Universal Catalyst for First-Order Optimization ... arXiv (Cornell University), 2015. Preprint. 185 citations. ... We introduce a generic scheme for accelerating first-order optimization methods in the sense of Nesterov, which builds upon a new analysis of the accelerated pro…
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) ... DagsHub Toggle ... DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) ... DagsHub Toggle ... DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ Sustainable Development Goals (abbr. SDGs) were adopted in 2015 by all United Nations (UN) members for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The aim of the 17 global goals is "peace and prosperity for people and the planet", tackling climate change, and working to preserv…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ In molecular biology, a transcription factor (TF) (or sequence-specific DNA-binding factor) is a protein that controls the rate of transcription of genetic information from DNA to messenger RNA, by binding to DNA sequences. Specificity can be due to sequence motifs, or epigenetic…

Sources

Spot something wrong? Report an issue