Escaping the Self-Confirmation Trap: An Execute-Distill-Verify Paradigm for Agentic Experience Learning

15d ago · Global · primary source: export.arxiv.org

A new framework called EDV aims to make large language model agents more reliable by preventing them from learning from their own mistakes, a problem researchers call the Self-Confirmation Trap [1]. The framework, detailed in a paper submitted in 2026, proposes decoupling experience learning into three distinct stages: Execute, Distill, and Verify [1]. Existing methods typically rely on a single agent that both performs tasks and decides what it has learned, a closed loop that can reinforce errors [1]. When an agent generates a wrong-but-self-consistent trajectory, it may misidentify the sequence as a successful experience, leading to cumulative errors during later retrieval and reuse [1][2]. To break this cycle, the EDV framework introduces multiple heterogeneous agents that explore the same task space in parallel during the Execute stage, generating diverse candidate trajectories [1][2]. A dedicated third-party agent then comparatively analyzes these trajectories in the Distill stage to produce candidate experiences, a step designed to reduce executor-centric summarization bias [1][2]. In the final Verify stage, the execution group validates these candidates through a consensus mechanism, and only approved experiences are written into shared or private memory [1][2]. The researchers evaluated EDV on three long-horizon benchmarks: tau2-bench, Mind2Web, and MMTB [1][2]. The results showed EDV consistently outperformed strong baselines, supporting the argument that reliable experience construction is essential for robust agent self-evolution [1][2]. The code for the framework has been made publicly available on GitHub [1][2]. The work was posted on arXiv, a preprint server where research communities share findings before formal peer review [1]. The paper is associated with arXivLabs, a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new features on the platform [1].

applicationresearch-papertool-releasemodel-releaseproduct-launchcontroversybenchmark

Background sources we checked (6)
  • arxiv.org ↗ Experience-driven self-evolution is critical for large language model (LLM) agents to improve through open-world interaction. However, existing experience learning methods mostly rely on single-agent loops, where the same agent executes tasks, summarizes outcomes, and determines …
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) ... DagsHub Toggle ... DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • arxiv.org ↗ With the creation of new datasets, the question arises of whether the data in them is complementary to other datasets for training ML models (see recent reviews for a perspective of catalysts informatics22, 23, 24). This is especially important when consolidating data with a vari…
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) ... DagsHub Toggle ... DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ Sustainable Development Goals (abbr. SDGs) were adopted in 2015 by all United Nations (UN) members for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The aim of the 17 global goals is "peace and prosperity for people and the planet", tackling climate change, and working to preserv…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ In molecular biology, a transcription factor (TF) (or sequence-specific DNA-binding factor) is a protein that controls the rate of transcription of genetic information from DNA to messenger RNA, by binding to DNA sequences. Specificity can be due to sequence motifs, or epigenetic…

Sources

Spot something wrong? Report an issue