FALCON: Transforming Cyber Threat Intelligence into Deployable IDS Rules with Self-Reflection

78d ago · Global · primary source: export.arxiv.org

A new agentic framework called FALCON automates the conversion of cyber threat intelligence into deployable intrusion-detection rules, addressing long-standing bottlenecks in manual rule management, according to a preprint posted on arXiv [1]. Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activity by matching network or host events against predefined rules [1]. Security analysts manually develop these rules from Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI), but the constant evolution of threats creates two persistent bottlenecks [1]. Before authoring a new rule, an analyst must reconcile incoming CTI with the existing rule base to decide whether to create, update, or retire a rule — a cognitively demanding process that contributes to “rule bloat” [1]. Second, automated verification of a new rule is difficult because zero-day threats lack ground truth from simulated testing, and the use of large language models introduces non-deterministic behavior [1]. FALCON, introduced by Shaswata Mitra and colleagues, is an agentic framework designed to address these challenges through CTI-grounded rule retrieval, generation, and validation [1]. At its core is a novel CTI-Rule semantic scorer that quantifies the functional alignment between a CTI and a rule [1]. The same signal drives a retriever that surfaces relevant deployed rules and a ground-truth-free validator that scores generated ones [1]. A generation pipeline produces deployable rules from CTI in real time and refines them through self-reflective syntactic, semantic, and performance validators [1]. Across network-based Snort and host-based YARA platforms on a purpose-built CTI-Rule dataset, FALCON attained a mean relevance of approximately 0.72, with 84% inter-rater agreement among cybersecurity analysts [1]. The framework’s self-reflective validation pipeline diagnoses a candidate rule along syntactic, semantic, and performance dimensions and returns feedback, enabling an LLM agent to iteratively refine sub-optimal rules with measurable gains over one-shot generation [3]. The authors note that the CTI-Rule semantic alignment model serves a dual role, retrieving relevant deployed rules and validating generated ones without requiring ground truth [3]. The preprint was posted on arXiv, an open-access repository for electronic preprints that is moderated but not peer-reviewed [9]. As of November 2024, the repository receives about 24,000 submissions per month [9]. The FALCON paper was submitted on 26 August 2025 and last revised on 23 June 2026 [1].

research-papersafety-researchtool-release

Background sources we checked (10)
  • arxiv.org ↗ Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activity by matching network or host events against predefined rules. Security analysts manually develop these rules from Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). As threats evolve, this manual pipeline faces two bottlene…
  • arxiv.org ↗ FALCON: Transforming Cyber Threat Intelligence into Deployable IDS Rules with Self-Reflection ... Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activity by matching network or host events against predefined rules. Security analysts manually develop these rule…
  • arxiv.org ↗ # FALCON: Autonomous Cyber Threat Intelligence Mining with LLMs for IDS Rule Generation arXiv (Cornell University), 2025. Preprint. 0 citations. ## Abstract Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activities by matching network or host activity again…
  • arxiv.org ↗ # FALCON: Autonomous Cyber Threat Intelligence Mining with LLMs for IDS Rule Generation arXiv (Cornell University), 2025. Preprint. 0 citations. ## Abstract Signature-based Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) detect malicious activities by matching network or host activity again…
  • info.arxiv.org ↗ arXiv Labs - arXiv info | arXiv e-print repository Skip to content # arXiv Labs Attention arXiv Users: arXiv Labs is pausing new proposals ## What are arXiv Labs? arXiv Labs are a way for the community to contribute new, useful features to arXiv. These integrations are avail…
  • blog.arxiv.org ↗ arXivLabs: a space for community innovation – arXiv blog arXiv has launched a new, formalized framework enabling innovative collaborations with individuals and organizations. “Members of our community want to contribute tools that enhance the arXiv experience, and we val…
  • info.arxiv.org ↗ arXivLabs: Showcase - arXiv info | arXiv e-print repository ... # arXivLabs: Showcase ... arXiv is surrounded by a community of researchers and developers working at the cutting edge of information science and technology. ... While the arXiv team is focused on our core mission—pr…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ arXiv (pronounced as "archive"—the X represents the Greek letter chi ⟨χ⟩) is an open-access repository of electronic preprints and postprints (known as e-prints) approved for posting after moderation, but not peer reviewed. It consists of scientific papers in the fields of mathem…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ 14 (fourteen) is the natural number following 13 and preceding 15.…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ A large language model (LLM) is a type of machine learning model designed for natural language processing tasks such as language generation. LLMs are language models with many parameters, and are trained with self-supervised learning on a vast amount of text.…

Sources

Spot something wrong? Report an issue