Mix, Don't Pick: Why Synthetic Corpus Composition Matters for Time Series Foundation Model Pretraining

27d ago · Global · primary source: export.arxiv.org

Selecting a synthetic data generator for pretraining time-series foundation models can double forecasting error, according to a new study that evaluated 11 generator families across two architectures [1]. The paper, posted to arXiv on June 6, 2026, found that under identical training budgets, the gap between the best-performing and worst-performing generator reached a factor of two in forecasting error [1]. The authors trained Chronos-T5-Mini and Moirai-Small from scratch using each generator family and observed that no single generator consistently outperformed the others across both model architectures [2]. Generator rankings proved unstable between the two architectures, meaning a generator that worked well for Chronos-T5-Mini did not necessarily perform well for Moirai-Small [2]. This finding undercuts the common assumption that a generator validated on one model family will transfer its utility to another [2]. Rather than attempting to solve the generator selection problem directly, the researchers tested a simple alternative: combining all 11 generator families into an equal-weight mixture [1]. That mixture matched or exceeded the performance of the best individual generator for both Chronos-T5-Mini and Moirai-Small [2]. When the mixture was further composed with real-world data, the resulting pretraining corpus produced the strongest forecasting results overall [2]. The work reframes synthetic pretraining as a corpus composition problem rather than a generator selection problem [1]. The authors recommend that composition choices be validated per model family instead of being assumed to transfer across architectures [2]. The study was conducted under the arXivLabs framework, which allows community collaborators to develop and share new features on the arXiv platform [1]. The findings carry implications for practitioners building time-series foundation models, where synthetic data generation has become a common strategy to supplement limited real-world datasets [1].

research-paper

Background sources we checked (6)
  • arxiv.org ↗ Choosing the wrong synthetic generator for time-series foundation model pretraining is costly: under identical training budgets, the best and worst generators produce up to a $2\times$ gap in forecasting error, yet the field has no principled way to make this choice. The problem …
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) [...] DagsHub Toggle [...] DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) [...] DagsHub Toggle [...] DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • arxiv.org ↗ CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) [...] DagsHub Toggle [...] DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ Sustainable Development Goals (abbr. SDGs) were adopted in 2015 by all United Nations (UN) members for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The aim of the 17 global goals is "peace and prosperity for people and the planet", tackling climate change, and working to preserv…
  • en.wikipedia.org ↗ In molecular biology, a transcription factor (TF) (or sequence-specific DNA-binding factor) is a protein that controls the rate of transcription of genetic information from DNA to messenger RNA, by binding to DNA sequences. Specificity can be due to sequence motifs, or epigenetic…

Sources

Spot something wrong? Report an issue