Understanding Diversity Collapse in RLVR via the Lens of Overtraining

22d ago · Global · primary source: export.arxiv.org

Multi-source synthesis by The Embedding Report from 2 sources. Every numeric and quoted claim traces to a cited source body (see methodology).

Researchers have identified 'diversity collapse' in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models, where initial improvements are followed by a decline in higher-order performance metrics.

RLVR is a key approach for enhancing the reasoning abilities of large language models, but it often suffers from diversity collapse, characterized by improving Pass@$1$ and degrading high-$k$ Pass@$k$[1]. This phenomenon is attributed to 'overtraining,' where further updates concentrate probability mass on favored trajectories after a problem's contribution to the reference metric has saturated. Restricting updates to problems with zero observed success can improve Pass@$256$ above the base model on difficult benchmarks[1]. Additionally, a non-trivial fraction of initially unsolvable problems become solvable during standard RLVR training. Another study found that Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) compresses the rollout distribution, and early Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) drives the probability below a certain threshold, leading to identical rewards and no group relative signal[2]. A two-stage diagnostic can stop failing runs early by combining pre-RL entropy triage with an early GRPO entropy monitor.

research-papercommentaryregulationcontroversy

Sources cited (2)

  1. arxiv.org ↗ E
  2. arxiv.org ↗ E
Spot something wrong? Report an issue